Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 01:56:01 -0500
Reply-To: Wesley Alden Pegden <wes@CS.UCHICAGO.EDU>
Sender: Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From: Wesley Alden Pegden <wes@CS.UCHICAGO.EDU>
Subject: Re: Rebuild? was: Model/year recommandation
In-Reply-To: <00ba01c38e31$3aa5ec40$a2a37fd8@DCW2YJ21>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
I'm on an original '84 engine for 175,000 miles now.
wes
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Art McGinn wrote:
> rob: the last vw air-cooled engines, '83.5 being the last year sold, were
> state of the art for that porche-type engine (the original was designed by
> mr. porsche himself). porsches were air-cooled until not that long ago. no
> reason to believe the air-cooled vw engine won't go for a very long time if
> one just changes the oil when supposed to. the pre-fuel-injected models had
> a touchy exhaust valve in no. 3 which could result in a blown engine if not
> kept properly adjusted but the later fuel-injected models had hydraulic
> valves that did not require adjustment. air-cooled is not as powerful as
> water-cooled but for an old vw bus hand, it doesn't really matter. my '82
> cruises at 65-70 on the freeway and that's just fine. elsewhere, well, the
> right lane is also just fine. if you're in a hurry, a vw van is the wrong
> vehicle. cheers, art, '82 westy
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rob S." <iH8myISP@SUSCOM.NET>
> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 10:57 PM
> Subject: Rebuild? was: Model/year recommandation
>
>
> > What exactly goes wrong that requires every vanagon to have an engine
> > rebuild done around 100K miles?
> >
> > My 82 is original un-rebuilt motor (as far as I know) and it runs out
> > VERY strong.
> >
> > with 92,000 and a broken odometer... should I be ready to spend for a
> > rebuild soon, regardless of how good it runs now?
> >
> > should I not fix the odometer so that it never reaches that dreaded
> > 100K mark (where the engine will instantly destroy itself)?
> >
> > -Sealover
> >
> >
> > On Thursday, October 9, 2003, at 12:19 AM, Art McGinn wrote:
> >
> > > jp: as a longtime bus owner and later a vanagon owner, i have a very
> > > strong bias against the water-cooled vanagon and a very strong
> > > preference
> > > for the air-cooled van, although the latter are getting harder to
> > > find. the
> > > waterboxer (water-cooled) has inherent heating problems, as most the
> > > posts
> > > on this list indicate. an air-cooled vanagon in reasonable shape with
> > > a
> > > recently rebuilt engine and a recently rebuilt transmission (rebuilt
> > > engine
> > > is necessary since the most recent was new in 1983) could run for many
> > > years
> > > with minimum trouble if reasonably maintained. good luck on whatever
> > > you
> > > choose. cheers, art mcginn, san fran, '82 westy (ex-'82 vanagon,
> > > ex-'68 bus)
> > >
>
| 
