Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 09:46:55 -0600
Reply-To: tom ring <taring@TARING.ORG>
Sender: Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From: tom ring <taring@TARING.ORG>
Organization: Tippen Ringware
Subject: Re: My Mechanic's Odd Reaction
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20031016181704.03dc8270@pop3.rockisland.com>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Not true. GM seems to like it, and it's been tested to meet a heck of a lot of
performance and corrosion specs.
From Sierra's info page -
"A recent General Motors service bulletin states, "It is our conclusion that
propylene glycol engine coolants will perform adequately under most vehicle
operating conditions" and that ". . .propylene glycol engine coolant may be
used in GM vehicles and will not affect the warranty coverage.""
"SIERRA Antifreeze has shown excellent performance in all aspects of the ASTM D
5216 specification (Propylene Glycol Base Engine Coolant) and in the Ford BL2-2
Dynamometer Test. Additionally, SIERRA Antifreeze meets all the corrosion
performance requirements of ASTM D 3306 and ASTM D 4985 (the primary
specifications for premium ethylene glycol antifreeze)."
And this is from the Amsoil site -
Meets the Following Corrosion Specifications
* Federal Specification A-A-870
* General Motors GM1899 (GM 6038 for non-aluminum
* General Motors GM 1825 for aluminum
* American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators
* Detroit Diesel Allison Div GMC
* ASTM D 3306
* ASTM D 4985
* ASTM D 2570-96
* ASTM D 2809-94
* ASTM D 4340-96
* ASTM D 1384-97A
* SAE J 1034
* SAE J 1034
* Cummins 85T8-2
* Ford ESE-M97B4H-A
* TMS OF ATA RP-302A
* AMC AM-4085
* Freightliner
Meets the Following Performance Specifications
* ASTM D5216-95 Automotive and Light Duty Service
* ASTM D6211-98 Fully Formulated for Heavy Duty Engines
* TMC (Truck Maintenance Council) - RP330 Heavy Duty Service
Corrosion test results
Corrosion weight loss, mg/coupon (ASTM D-184)
MAX ALLOWABLE TYPICAL
Brass -10 -4.3
Copper -10 -1
Solder -30 -.07
Steel -10 0
Iron -10 0
Aluminum -30 +0.7
Aluminum Corrosion (ASTM D-4340)
Aluminum -1 -0.3
Looks pretty comprehensive to me.
Tom
On 16 Oct 2003 at 18:19, Doktor Tim wrote:
> At 07:05 PM 10/16/2003, you wrote:
> Untested by the manufacturers and/or unapproved. In fact, not just the Euro
> marks but I have yet to hear of any manufacturer world wide that approves
> propylene glycol, no mater what else might or not be in there. Does not
> meet specs. Your experiment.
>
>
------
Tom Ring K0TAR, ex-WA2PHW EN34hx
85 Westphalia GL Albert
96 Jetta GL The Intimidator
taring@taring.org
"It is better to go into a turn slow, and come out fast, than to go into a turn fast
and come out dead." Stirling Moss