Date:         Tue, 21 Oct 2003 17:42:02 -0400
Reply-To:     David Beierl <dbeierl@ATTGLOBAL.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         David Beierl <dbeierl@ATTGLOBAL.NET>
Subject:      Re: Hummer vs Dodge
Comments: To: Andrew Grebneff <andrew.grebneff@STONEBOW.OTAGO.AC.NZ>
In-Reply-To:  <a06002001bbba6b3715e1@[203.167.170.14]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 02:21 AM 10/21/2003, Andrew Grebneff wrote:
>Anyone wanna see what happens when two of the most useless and
>primitive vehicles made since the 50s have a head-on?

Sure!  Which Hummer are you talking about -- the civilianized HMMWV (H1) or
the GMC Tahoe chassis with a funny body on it (H2)?  For that matter, which
Dodge?

david
ps -- the Army seems pretty happy with their HMMWV, though I can't help
thinking there ought to be a use still for a much smaller vehicle like the
old Jeep.
Those are good-sized trucks, Army versions gross 8,000# and up and the
civilian ones 10,300# or 12,100#.

--
David Beierl - Providence RI USA -- http://pws.prserv.net/synergy/Vanagon/
'84 Westy "Dutiful Passage"
'85 GL "Poor Relation"