Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (October 2003, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 25 Oct 2003 23:02:18 -0700
Reply-To:     Karl Wolz <wolzphoto@WORLDNET.ATT.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Karl Wolz <wolzphoto@WORLDNET.ATT.NET>
Subject:      Re: Emailing: Suspect Bivalve 001 (2)
Comments: To: Andrew Grebneff <andrew.grebneff@STONEBOW.OTAGO.AC.NZ>
In-Reply-To:  <a06002002bbc0c1847679@[203.167.170.57]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Andrew,

I've opened my bivalve (Westy), and cannot see any "muscle scars". Perhaps I need to me in the southern hemisphere to get a low enough light angle??

Never suspected VWs were mollusks.

;-)

Thank you,

Karl Wolz

-----Original Message----- From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Grebneff Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2003 9:43 PM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Re: Emailing: Suspect Bivalve 001 (2)

>Hi, Andrew! > >Here is the first view; I don't seem to be able to send both views >on the same e-mail, evem though I've followed instructions; and if I >put them both in a folder, nobody can seem to open it. > >Here goes, >Linda >----------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- >Your files are attached and ready to send with this message. > >Attachment converted: 36 GB:Suspect Bivalve 001 (2).jpg (JPEG/ogle) (00044C9F)

Hi Linda

Those sure look like lepadomorph scuta to me. I was fooled by a Recent one too... had it cataloged as an aplysiomorph (seahare) gastropod for a few years... Bruce Marshall spotted my mistake.

If you look closely you will see that there is not a bivalve hinge structure; if held under a strong low-angle elgih, the muscle scars will be nonmolluscan also.

I attach an image of my fossil specimen (cc to list will strip it); it is an unusually strongly-sculptured form. Measures about 30mm, so it's a huge gooseneck, too. I will have John Buckeridge, a barnacle specialist, examine it when he's down in Dunedin for the Geological Society Conference in November. And if I'm right, it will be recataloged in the Geology Dept collection! -- Andrew Grebneff Dunedin, New Zealand 64 (3) 473-8863 <andrew.grebneff@stonebow.otago.ac.nz> Fossil preparator Seashell, Macintosh & VW/Toyota van nut _________________________ I want your sinistral gastropods! _________________________ Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is top posting frowned upon?


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.