Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (November 2003, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 17 Nov 2003 10:40:32 -0500
Reply-To:     Scott Walker <swalker72@KNOLOGY.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Scott Walker <swalker72@KNOLOGY.NET>
Subject:      Re: "conventional" transmission for a mid-engine conversion
Comments: To: "Sudhir H. Desai" <sudhir@12INCH.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

The ideal of course would be a transaxle designed for mid-engine such as from a Pantera or a 914. But you did say that economics plays a factor, so what I would suggest would be to do what off-roaders do when driveline angles get severe, and that is to use CV's instead of U-joints. Depending on how much cargo area you plan on losing, it should fit. I saw a split window bus a few weeks back that had a Mopar small block, 727 trans and narrowed Ford rear end. Almost zero cargo room, but the owner seemed happy.

Maybe this helps....maybe not.

Scott

----- Original Message ----- From: "Sudhir H. Desai" <sudhir@12INCH.COM> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:26 AM Subject: "conventional" transmission for a mid-engine conversion

> i know one of our resident germans has performed a mid-engine swap on his > van using the audi longitudinally mounted v6+transaxle (which normally > powers the f wheels) and shifting it back to the r wheels as a unit. i am > thinking of going the non-german way yet again, and using either ford or > chevy components in a mid engine swap. to keep cost down, i would need to > use a ford/chevy transmission. my uncertainty is that the output shaft on > the transmission will not directly bolt up to the input shaft on a rear > diff. or, if i use a "driveshaft" of sorts, it would bind constantly from > being at a not-normal angle. the other option in my mind would be to slide > the rear end further back, thereby extending the wheelbase of the van, but > that brings up another set of problems.. namely sheetmetal fabrication. > > anyways, if poeple have comments/suggestions, please reply-all, for flames > just pmail me to keep them off the list ;) > TIA. > ~sudhir > >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.