Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (November 2003, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 19 Nov 2003 03:19:20 -0500
Reply-To:     "Daniel L. Katz" <katzd54@YAHOO.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         "Daniel L. Katz" <katzd54@YAHOO.COM>
Subject:      Re: OT Re: "Green" solar battery charger
Comments: To: Ryan Press <ryan@PRESSLAB.US>

On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 12:30:05 -0800, Ryan Press <ryan@PRESSLAB.US> wrote:

ryan:

i agree with all you have said.

after re-reading the many posts on this topic, i realized that perhaps the confusion could be cleared up by noting:

1. the equation R = V/I is the mathematical definition of resistance, and is valid irrespective of whether a material is ohmic or non-ohmic.

2. ohmic materials, however, obey the equation I = V/R, with R constant; i.e., ohm's law.

here is a beautiful application of ohm's law.

suppose an incandescent light bulb is rated at 10 W @ 10 VDC and we want to know the output at 11 VDC. assuming that the filament obey's ohm's law for current values over at least +/- 10 % from nominal, we know at once that the current increases by the same factor as voltage, or 10%. therefore, writing power as VI, the power increases to (1.1)^2 = 1.21 of its former value, or an increase of 21%. note that because ohm's law was valid, it was unnecessary to know the (constant) resistance of the filament.

on the other hand, we know that the resistance of a hot filament may increase by an order of magnitude or more from its cold value, and over that range, the filament is obviously not ohmic.

daniel

>This has been discussed ad nauseam on other forums. Okay, in an attempt >to curb these OT posts I thought I'd throw my $0.02 in. When Mr. Ohm >created his "law" he didn't know about reactances and nonlinearities. He >was using metals which had quite a linear response. So in the strict >sense Ohm's Law only applies to something with a linear relationship. >Even then I can't think of anything with a perfect linear relationship, >hence the quotes around "law". > >But I think it is perfectly reasonable to approximate part of a nonlinear >device using Ohm's Law. This is very useful and I use it all the time. >It works great for most everything if you add a couple constraints, say in >time or in voltage. > >So by strict definition I would say Ohm's Law is meant to be used on >linear devices (simple resistors). Even then it's not perfect but it >works pretty darned well. And I'll continue to use Ohm's Law to >approximate a nonlinear device and that will work pretty darned well too. > >Ryan


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.