Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (December 2003, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 1 Dec 2003 01:25:34 -0500
Reply-To:     David Beierl <dbeierl@ATTGLOBAL.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         David Beierl <dbeierl@ATTGLOBAL.NET>
Subject:      Re: more oil pressure buzzer / light problems
Comments: To: Joe18d@AOL.COM
In-Reply-To:  <c1.3a0d055a.2cfc06b2@aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 09:51 PM 11/30/2003, Joe in NH wrote: > This engine is a fresh rebuild, with about 1k miles, it runs great. >What next? I am contemplating taking it to the dealer to have the actual oil >pressure tested. I hate going to the dealer, any dealer. Any constructive or >humorus input is appreciated, Joe in NH

The buzzer is trying to tell you something important and potentially drastic is wrong. If the buzzer is right, you're in danger of wrecking the engine, possibly very rapidly. Under the circumstances, I'm unable to see any sensible course other than parking the vehicle as soon as you can pull to the side of the road, and not proceeding until you know whether it's pulling your leg. A reading with a known-good pressure gauge is the only way I know of to unequivocally answer that question.

So my constructive advice is stick a gauge on it, run it up to the cockpit if possible, and find out who's lying, instead of fiddling with what *might* be wrong -- and so far isn't -- with the buzzer. That will tell you whether it's safe to drive it, and you can go on from there.

Nobody wants to find they have such a problem (and you likely don't, though it's less likely with everything you try that isn't the trouble) -- but it's like tetanus, the consequences of getting it are so awful that it just doesn't make sense not to assume the buzzer is correct until you've proved otherwise. But that's what I read over and over again, people basically taking the buzzer to court and making it prove it's right before they take the rudimentary precautions to avoid destroying their engine. I might do the same -- I'm certainly capable of wishful thinking. I recall once many years ago with my Saab 96 (yeah, yeah, with that, a Fiat 128, a Sunbeam Alpine and a Vanagon I'm a glutton for punishment) the right-rear brake was making some awful noise. But I'd never been inside a drum brake, was scared to death of them, and I managed to convince myself that it was the front. Of course when the pads didn't fix the noise I knew right away that I'd really known all along that it was the RR and not the RF. We humans seem to be good at that. Yes Ben, I'm a human last I checked... ;)

david

-- David Beierl - Providence RI USA -- http://pws.prserv.net/synergy/Vanagon/ '84 Westy "Dutiful Passage" '85 GL "Poor Relation"


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.