Not unlike wrapping yourself in the latest largest SUV based on the theory that it keeps you safer. When you nail the family of four driving a hybrid it's their problem for not buying into the bigger = safer mentality. Those that choose to spend that much money on a car justify it in strange ways. There seems to be a twisted sort of snobbery involved when it comes to the price for such advances. Look out for you and yours is the ad pitch. They have better visibility without concern for blinding the oncoming driver. I would be concerned with that oncoming driver blinded by Xenons losing his track and swerving into my lane but what do I know. I choose to drive cars that have a combined value of far less than one of these excessive beasts. Owen Brand (Ok I will list most of the fleet since it is relevant) 84 Westy 90 Saab 900 94 Volvo 940 97 Royal Enfield Bullet 500 ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Brodbeck" > > So then the question becomes, is it okay for drivers of expensive cars > to create a hazard for oncoming traffic so that they, themselves can see > better... |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.