Robert, IIRC, you are using the later 2.0 short block with a counter flow head. From all that I have read, you may have lost as much as 10 hp off the top. Torque is rumored to stay the same. Again, I have never seen back to back dyno runs with just the head change published so this is mainly conjecture based on the superior flow of the later head. Any plans on dynoing yours? Scott ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Keezer" <warmerwagen@HOTMAIL.COM> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 1:32 AM Subject: Re: Eurovan engines...was: Re: Which is it?
> I just talked with a Eurovan owner- 109 hp is correct for the 5-cylinder. > This engine has 140 ft lb or torque @ 2200 rpm. > > By comparison my Vanagon engine ('95 Golf 2.0) has 115 hp @5400 rpm and 126 > ft lb of torque @3200 RPM. > > Robert > > _________________________________________________________________ > Our best dial-up offer is back. Get MSN Dial-up Internet Service for 6 > months @ $9.95/month now! http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup > > |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.