Date:         Wed, 10 Dec 2003 18:59:36 -0700
Reply-To:     jbrush@AROS.NET
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Anonymous Digest <jbrush@AROS.NET>
Subject:      Re: Power of a 2.0L Air cooled vs 2.1L???
In-Reply-To:  <200312102316.hBANG3cb066163@phobos.aros.net>

>> Conclusion: am building a 2.0L as we speak, my plan is to put out a strong
>> 90 to 110hp out of this one amd keep it reliable.

Yikes! I tried to catch up on this thread in the digest because I must
have missed something. You know how to build a 2.0l aircooled to put out
110hp? That's nearly double the stock HP rating.

Did I miss something, or do I have the only 2.0l FI 81 air cooled factory
rated in the high 60's HP?? (low 50's after 200K)   :-)

If you do get there, please share, and I am not being a wise guy. I just
think that much power requires something that won't resemble a 2.0l AC, if
you add the caveat of keeping it reliable. Of course, I am thinking pretty
much stock. What do you have in mind?

Thanks,

John