Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (December 2003, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 24 Dec 2003 02:09:45 -0800
Reply-To:     "J. Harvey" <jtharvey2@HOTMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         "J. Harvey" <jtharvey2@HOTMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Tail light update
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed

Maybe I'm missing something but.....

Why not rig the dummy lights to operate as additional low wattage running lights and also have them function as additional high wattage brake lights? I think that's what the linked image shows.

'85 Silver Sunroof '91 GTi 2.0 8v '76 BMW 2002

>From: Robert Keezer <warmerwagen@HOTMAIL.COM> >Reply-To: Robert Keezer <warmerwagen@HOTMAIL.COM> >To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM >Subject: Re: Tail light update >Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 01:50:11 -0800 > >That's right! I second this emotion. The reason the tailight has a lower >wattage than the brake light is to prevent glare , and contrast between the >brake and tail lights for other motorists.. The high voltage craze has >spilled over to the tailights , and I think it's a mistake. > >I can see tailights of early VW's and cars made in the 40's when I see >them, >if you can't , you need : > >1. Lots of carrot juice >2. New glasses >3. night vision goggles! > >I was going to say 4.: drive only during the day- but that's too much to >ask. > >This need to blind other drivers has gone too far. >I think it can be helpful to have an additional red lense rear foglight for >fog. Ok -two rear red foglights if that will make you happy. > >I use the stock rear lights. > >One thing I am a staunch advocate of is a rear third brake light. I see a >lot of rear -ended Vanagons at junkyards. > >Robert > >1982 Westfalia > > > > >----Original Message Follows---- >From: Matthew <poll7356@UIDAHO.EDU> >Reply-To: Matthew <poll7356@UIDAHO.EDU> >To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM >Subject: Re: Tail light update >Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 13:43:10 -0800 > >yikes! this concerns me because the tail lights are too bright wrt to >the brake lights. You *need* a big difference in the tail light and >brake lights so the guy behind you can see the brake lights! Don't >believe me? Follow someone with lights that are not well differentiated >and you'll know exactly what i mean. > >>http://www.weirdstuffwemake.com/automotive/vanagon/pics/misc/NewBusTailLights.jpg > > >Robert >1982 Westfalia > >_________________________________________________________________ >Check your PC for viruses with the FREE McAfee online computer scan. >http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

_________________________________________________________________ Get reliable dial-up Internet access now with our limited-time introductory offer. http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.