Date:         Thu, 25 Dec 2003 18:48:58 -0500
Reply-To:     jesse johnson <jjmojo@BLAZENET.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         jesse johnson <jjmojo@BLAZENET.NET>
Subject:      Re: cutting out bottom of airbox to increase air intake and add HP
In-Reply-To:  <127.378a1179.2d1b31e8@aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

Yes.. cold air is much more efficient than warm engine bay air. This
has been a debate with watercooled inline 4 tuners for years. Keep in
mind.. you will never even notice the hp gains until you hit around
5000 rpm's and above with a "hogged out" air box anyway.. who drives
there vans at that rpm very often?
Cool air... K&N filter in the stock box.. that is always the way to go
unless your racing your van .. ha ha ha..
later,
jesse
89 carat

On Dec 24, 2003, at 1:16 PM, JordanVw@AOL.COM wrote:

>>
>>> Chris,
>>>     How about eliminating the box altogether and just adding a cone
>>> type
>> K&N
>>> filter to the AFM? Of course you would have to fabricate a
>>> bracket/adapter
>>> to hold up the AFM. Hmmmm......
>>>
>
>  i was thinking the same thing - but  wont drawing in warm air from the
> engine compartment reduce HP?    isnt cold air more dense, and colder,
> denser air
> is better for fuel/air mixture?
>
> chris