Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (December 2003, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 22 Dec 2003 23:58:54 +1300
Reply-To:     Andrew Grebneff <andrew.grebneff@STONEBOW.OTAGO.AC.NZ>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Andrew Grebneff <andrew.grebneff@STONEBOW.OTAGO.AC.NZ>
Subject:      Re: (NVC) But my comments on the concept Microbus...
In-Reply-To:  <000e01c3c839$46bba6e0$6b881f43@jklun>
Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii

>It is UGLY! I wouldn't be caught dead driving or owning one.

I have to agree. VW has totally lost its way. Once it made simple but sophistcated vehicles which were affordable (in some markets! They were expensive in most). Now it makes aluminum Audis, Lamborghinis and Bugattis... none of which are even reliable, I'd bet.

>VW has always been known for its styling expertise as evidenced by >the Rabbit to Golf transition

The Rabbit WAS a Golf (abeit a bastardized one), with badge-engineering.

>upper scale Jetta- oooops... I meant Passat.

The Passat has always been unrelated to the Gold, apart from sharing drivetrains. Tha Jetta (Bora) is a 3-box Golf.

>I get the distinct impression that VW is floundering as a company

Amen.

>It's time VW went out into the real world and asked people what they >really want instead of relying on Ford's, GM's or Chrysler/Daimler's >marketing figures.

If VW really wanted to bring back buyers by nostalgia, it could have done the job properly. The New Beetle could have been a modern rear-engined boxer-powered car, but no, instead they tacked a tacky skin onto the tawdry Golf 4. The new Microbus coould have looked very similar to a Split van (the best-looking van evey, even perhaps one of the 2 vans ever made that could be called beautiful) with modern mechanicals and practical interior. But they spit the dummy again... -- Andrew Grebneff Dunedin, New Zealand 64 (3) 473-8863 <andrew.grebneff@stonebow.otago.ac.nz> Fossil preparator Seashell, Macintosh & VW/Toyota van nut -------------------------------------- Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is top posting frowned upon?


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.