Vanagon EuroVan
Previous (more recent) messageNext (less recent) messagePrevious (more recent) in topicNext (less recent) in topicPrevious (more recent) by same authorNext (less recent) by same authorPrevious page (February 2004, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:52:40 -0600
Reply-To:     Stan Wilder <wilden1-1@SBCGLOBAL.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Stan Wilder <wilden1-1@SBCGLOBAL.NET>
Subject:      Re: "green" cars (NVC)
Comments: To: Ryan Press <ryan@PRESSLAB.US>
In-Reply-To:  <3527.192.168.1.101.1076991555.squirrel@www.presslab.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Depolymerization combined with cleaner & hotter engines (ceramic? turbine?) seems likely for the future. Ryan --------------------------- Clip -----------------------------

Ceramics, really? You can be forgiven for finding the idea of ceramics in engines unbelievable. After all, aren't they too brittle and breakable to be useful where mechanical stress and movement are encountered? The types you're used to sure are, but new formulations are appearing that are remarkably tough, so much so they look promising for components from wrist pins to valves. USACA (the United States Advanced Ceramics Association, which includes such companies as Allied Signal Aerospace, Allison, Caterpillar, Coors, Dow Corning, Dupont, GE, IBM, Kyocera, Martin Marietta, Rolls-Royce, Textron, 3M, etc.) states that intensive R&D has yielded dramatic improvements in ceramics, including: Silicon nitrides now have twice the room temperature strength, three times the high temp strength, and 10,000 times the fatigue life of previous versions. Manufacturing yields of useable parts have increased from 2-5% in 1980 to 40-50% today. A ceramic turbine rotor has run over 1,000 hours in a prototype engine. Monolithic ceramics are demonstrating that they can take impact, tip rub, and minor damage without catastrophic failure. Ceramics are not only resistant to high temperatures, they're also good insulators, so can be used to keep those btu's where you want them and to protect metal parts. They have exceptional wear characteristics too, especially in areas where lubrication is sparse or non-existent at start-up. And how about components that weigh less than half as much as their metal equivalents? They'll cut parasitic losses, allow higher operating speeds, and enhance smoothness by reducing reciprocating mass. These are the kinds of advantages those relentless engineers can't leave alone. Already out there Ceramics have been used in automobiles for years. There have always been spark plug insulators, after all, and don't forget water pump shaft seals, catalytic converter pellets and monolithic cores, and oxygen sensors. And some breakthrough applications have been around for a while, but are unsung. For example, Porsche installed cast-in-place aluminum titanate ceramic exhaust port liners in the 944 because they helped insulate exhaust heat from the engine, so the cooling system could be made smaller. Since the exhaust stream lost less heat, the turbocharger operated more efficiently. There was also some benefit in more complete combustion, which reduced HC emissions and catalytic converter light-off time. The team of Isuzu and Kyocera has offered silicon nitride diesel glow plugs since '81, which heat up many times faster than the metal type. Mazda and Toyota started using ceramic diesel precombustion chambers in the mid-eighties to retain heat, thus keeping combustion temperature high and improving cold running characteristics. Mitsubishi has put ceramic rocker arm pads into production. An impressive application is the ceramic turbocharger rotor. Introduced in late '85 on a number of Nissan 300 ZX's, it's much lighter than its metal counterpart so has less inertia and reaches boost rpm more quickly, which reduces turbo lag considerably. This benefit wasn't only noticed by the Japanese: Garrett AiResearch created a ceramic-rotor turbo for Buick, which put it into the limited-production Regal Grand National GNX -- one of the hottest cars in the world back then. Boost time was cut in half. Too high But availability of the best materials imaginable won't get them into engines if the car makers aren't interested. Even if they can demonstrate better performance and durability, the auto manufacturers want them to cost the same as metal. Ceramics suppliers understand this and have been working for years to get costs down. For instance, in the mid-eighties Champion Spark Plug was looking for a way to utilize its excess ceramic-making capacity, and came up with a patented material called "Ceraform ZTA" (Zirconium Toughened Alumina). It cost about 1/7th as much as other ceramics, yet was easy to form and met the physical requirements for flexural strength and impact and thermal shock resistance that are necessary for many engine parts. The company successfully demonstrated valves, seats, guides, and piston pins, but so far there have been no takers among the auto manufacturers. With what's called "the economies of scale," ceramics will come way down in price. It's probable that these will include monolithic silicone nitride, which is as strong as metal, but doesn't like impact, and has only 1/10th the flaw tolerance of steel. Then there are ceramic composites that consist of a silicon nitride matrix with silicon carbide "whiskers," hair-like strands that make the stuff 40% more resistant to internal cracking than non-reinforced monolithic materials. The manufacturing techniques required to eliminate flaws is a major factor in the current high price. Another is that "net build" is necessary. In other words, the part has to come out of the mold at precisely the right size because you can't do any machining. First, the valve train These modern materials lend themselves especially to valve train applications. Wear could be reduced at pushrod tips and rocker arm fulcrums, or cam followers with OHC, which would stabilize valve train performance over the life of the engine. Ceramic guides could cut oil consumption, and seats of the same material wouldn't erode or recede even though the lead is out of gasoline. These are low-risk/low-return parts. The most significant benefits would come from a more daring step: ceramic valves. The 60% weight reduction would allow higher engine speed and/or lower friction and less parasitic loss. Plain lifters could be substituted where expensive roller tappets are now used. Beyond valves, there are ceramic wrist pins that weigh much less than metal, yet are so much stiffer they can be made considerably smaller in diameter. Rings are a possible application, too. Perfect Circle is researching a ceramic coating with fabulous wear characteristics. Or, how about compression rings of a titanium nitride-based cermet? They've been tested for 100 hours at full load and rpm with no appreciable wear and, amazingly, no breakage. Cylinder liners are a logical extension, then pistons with ceramic crowns, completely non-metallic pistons, and ceramic-insulated combustion chambers. Blue sky The ultimate the idea can be taken to is the low heat rejection Diesel (LHRD), sometimes called the adiabatic diesel (really a misnomer because "adiabatic" means a total lack of heat loss, which is as elusive an achievement as absolute zero). In this ideal powerplant, all the Btu's in the fuel would be converted into useful work in the cylinders and by a turbocharger. There'd be no waste heat, so the cooling system could be eliminated and levels of efficiency would be fantastic. An exciting prospect, but really just a goal to work toward that will probably never be fully achieved. The technological breakthroughs needed are formidable, especially in the area of lubrication -- no known oil, even synthetic, could withstand the temperatures involved, and with solid oxide lubes you lose the necessary benefits of liquids. As a spokesman for one ceramics company told me, "It makes sense to insulate a diesel to some degree, but it's my view that you'll be getting incremental improvements and you'll get to the point where it's not worth the next step." The other futuristic possibility is an efficient and relatively inexpensive gas turbine, most likely a tiny unit that could bring practicality to the hybrid. That is, an electric car with an internal combustion-powered generator to provide acceptable range once you drive out of congested areas where ZEVs (Zero Emissions Vehicles) are required. The metal turbines that have been around for decades waste heat like mad, and require expensive alloys and complex machining, but those drawbacks could be eliminated with ceramics. That would give us a smooth, nearly emission-free engine that could run on any flammable liquid from drain oil to scotch. There's even the possibility of burning powdered coal. But, as with the LHRD, we're talking 21st century. No problem Will all this affect auto service and repair? Not very much. There would be no procedural changes at all for ceramic exhaust port and intake manifold liners, pushrod tips, rocker arm pads and fulcrums, and lifters. While valves, seats, and guides would require more careful handling, they probably wouldn't wear out. There'd be no chance of cutting faces and seats in the normal way, but, again, they shouldn't need anything but maybe a little lapping to get rid of deposits. After all, there can't be any corrosion, and it would take almost unimaginable heat to burn out the sealing surfaces. The thing to remember about all this is that alternative materials will be introduced gradually, a part here, another there the next year as the manufacturers see performance and durability improvements that are cost beneficial.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.