On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, David Beierl wrote: > Turbines, though, like ship propulsion plants. Steam turbines in railroad > service haven't worked out too well (understatement) because of dirt and > vibration problems. Well, there's that, and turbines have some serious disadvantages for rail use. They require expensive precision reduction gears to gear them down to wheel speeds, they can't be throttled efficiently except over a small range, and they can't run in reverse. Most of those problems disappear if you use them as part of an electric drivetrain, but it's awfully hard to beat the efficiency of a low-speed diesel engine. Turbines make more sense in ships and airplanes. Both tend to run their engines continuously at a high percentage of total available power. Airplanes can't back up, and ships can carry smaller reversing turbines.
David Brodbeck, N8SRE '82 Volkswagen Diesel Westfalia '86 Volvo 240DL wagon |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.