On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, tom ring wrote: > Possibly true, but they don't scale to small size very well. Turning the fuel > directly to hot gas to spin the turbine is probably more efficient, and even > more important, has a better power to weight ratio. For instance, I haven't > seen a lot of steam turbine prop aircraft. You don't see a lot of water-cooled prop aircraft either. ;) Aircraft powerplants need high power to weight ratio. This is more important than any other factor, including fuel efficiency. The thing about steam power is it's HEAVY. Not only do you have to carry around a boiler, you have to carry around quite a bit of water and possibly a condenser as well.
David Brodbeck, N8SRE '82 Volkswagen Diesel Westfalia '86 Volvo 240DL wagon |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.