Why not kill two birds with one stone by designing a storage unit (bag? box?) shaped to be more aerodynamic than the existing well? Not just a cover... I have a bag up there that I made. It's not aerodynamic, I'm sure, just lumpy. And I also have my kayak above that. FWIW, my gas mileage is no worse with all that stuff up there than it was without it. The van does handle worse - I think that's wind catching the kayak from the side. To my surprise, the kayak has more impact on van handling than it had on the handling of my Prius or my Civic, where there was 3-4 feet of overhang at each end. I guess that's simply because it's so much higher.
Joy ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Joy Hecht and Matilda, 1989 Burgundy Vanagon and Henrietta, sad-eyed orangutan who waltzes with Matilda and me and Bicycle and Kayak, who ride on Matilda For musings about life and the vanadventures: http://users.rcn.com/jhecht/gypsy ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > -----Original Message----- > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM]On Behalf > Of Martin Jagersand > Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 10:45 PM > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: On the Issue of Drag Coefficient Numbers for the Vanagon > > > > the later Vanagon with front spoiler lip,the values are: 0.44 > and 3.08 m2; > > > for the Westfalia, the numbers are 0.52 and 3.17 m2; > > To mee it looks like the reason for the worse number for the Westy > is the front luggage rack. Anyone thought about making a cover > for it that would allow for a smooth transition from the front > to the roof? Even better, anyone knows how to actually calculate > a shape that would avoid cavitation and extra drag? > > Subjectively it feels like my '82 westy "hits an air wall" at about > 120km/h. Wind noise goes from quiet at 90 km/h to moderate at 100-110 > to deafening at 120km/h and over. Can't even hear the engine, which > itself isn't exactly quiet with fully open turbo wastegate and > 2.5" Dynomax performance exhaust. > > The relative Cd ratio .44/.52 = .85 suggests that a 15% reduction > in drag should be achievable if somehow it is possible to restore > good airflow around the westy luggage rack. > > Anyone has a solution? > > /Martin ('82 Westy 1.9TD and '94 Westy 2.5l) > |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.