Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 2004, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 12 Apr 2004 10:41:05 -0700
Reply-To:     mark drillock <drillock@EARTHLINK.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         mark drillock <drillock@EARTHLINK.NET>
Subject:      Re: back heat removal, comparative experiences among my vans
Comments: To: Sam Walters <sam.cooks@VERIZON.NET>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

I agree, Sam. I have done it both ways, no difference noted. The heater hose "T" connectors have a smaller feed pipe inside diameter on the legs that go to the rear heater than they do on the legs for the front heater. Only about 6mm or so, versus about 10mm for the front heater feeds. In any case, a tiny opening compared to the main coolant passages to the radiator.

Any Vanagon cooling system that depends on blocking that tiny 6mm bypass needs repair IMO.

Mark

Sam Walters wrote: > ... > Basic physics - larger pipes and openings have much less resistance than > smaller ones. > > And the much larger pipes and hoses carrying coolant to the radiator > offer significantly less "resistance" than the smaller hoses going to > the front and rear heaters. While some of the coolant will flow through > the rear heater hoses if they are left in place connected and thus > return to the engine without having been to the radiator, all of it will > not circulate through there and bypass the radiator. Given the size > differential of the pipes, most of it will go to the front and the > radiator as that is the path of least resistance. Coolant will still > flow straight through the T toward the front heater even though some > will make the 90 degree turn into the rear heater loop. > > In addition to thinking about it from a physics perspective, I have some > practical experience: > > Some PO (2nd back I think) took the rear heater out of my 85 weekender. > The hoses are connected under the rear seat with a short metal bypass > tube. The van runs very cool and the front heater works fine. In fact, > it seems to heat up the front as fast as my other vans. Didn't miss the > rear heater this past winter but had thought I would. > > ....


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.