Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 2004, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 11 May 2004 15:34:05 +1000
Reply-To:     STEPHEN OVERMYER <S.OVERMYER@UWS.EDU.AU>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         STEPHEN OVERMYER <S.OVERMYER@UWS.EDU.AU>
Subject:      Re: Shocking Thread
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

From: The Bus Depot <vanagon@BUSDEPOT.COM>

> Kinda idly curious what folks with 2wd's are using for shocks, and > what they think of 'me. I've used the Gasajust GRT combination, and > found it to be OK, if not special.

It depends somewhat on what you're looking for. Gas shocks such as Bilstein and KYB are stiffer than the original-equipment oil-filled shocks. This will improve cornering and nose dive when braking, but will also make the ride a bit harder (less forgiving of potholes, road surfaces, etc.). The KYB's are notably stiffer and are definitely not as "refined" as the Bilsteins (but are much cheaper).

A good oil-filled shock, by comparison, will retain the "stock" VW ride, as this is what VW originally used. Boge was the factory shock on the Vanagon. But perhaps a better choice is Alko's version. For the same price as the Boge it's much heavier duty - it looks more like a Bilstein. It performs well but still rides smoother than a gas-charged shock. In my opinion it's the best value for a Vanagon.

So depending on your tastes and budget, I think either the Bilsteins or Alkos would be a wise choice. I've never tried the Koni's so I couldn't comment on them.

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~

I'd agree with Ron's appraisal of the various shock options for the T3 but will add my 2 cents worth regarding Konis since I have settled on their use almost exclusively after trying many different shocks including Bilstein with whom Konis share much in common.

I prefer the Koni to the Bilstein as they have all the same desirable attributes like lack of bodyroll,virtually eliminating nose-diving etc but I find the Koni less harsh on the vehicles ride over pot holes,rough surfaces and so on.

Others mileage may vary but I find the Koni as good a performer as the Bilstein but more comfortable to have under you...

Cheers, Steve O NSW Australia '92 Transporter WBX Kombi '00 Transporter Double Cab '03 Transporter Double Cab (work truck) '78 Landrover Series 3 Soft top (ex-Aust.Army)


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.