Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 2004, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 12 May 2004 10:51:11 -0700
Reply-To:     Steven Dodson <steven@EPOCHDESIGN.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Steven Dodson <steven@EPOCHDESIGN.COM>
Subject:      Re: Diesels on NPR this morning
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

If you read up on refining biodiesel, you'll find that the byproduct is simply a biodegradable vegetable glycerin. This glycerin can be composted and may serve as a fertilizer for the plants grown to produce the next batch of fuel. The glycerin can also be used to make soaps. As far as power plants burning biological material, "biological material" or "renewable fuels" can mean anything. Raw vegetable oil is not very clean when burned, contrary to the "greasels" out there. Same with burning straight crude vs refined petroleum. Once the vegetable oil is transesterified (refined), it is very clean burning and the byproduct is inert. You won't get much better than that until we're electrolyzing hydrogen from water using solar power. It's pretty expensive to run an economy on subsidized agriculture. Biodiesel is a good start and much better than the Bush plan to make hydrogen from petroleum. My goal is to not have any gas consuming vehicles by this time next year.

-Steven Dodson Kneeland, CA "Inga" the 87 Syncro

-----Original Message----- Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 23:52:53 -0400 From: Joy Hecht <jhecht@ALUM.MIT.EDU> Subject: Re: Diesels on NPR this morning

There is a question, though, about what kind of biological material is used to make the fuel. I don't know how auto fuel is made, but with power plants that burn biological material, it's not clear that they are that much better than petroleum. They put out GHG emissions, and if the fuel isn't grown organically, its cultivation generates a lot of water pollution from ag runoff. Is the biological matter used to make biodiesel the waste from some other ag process or grown specifically for fuel? In the former case, what is now done with that waste. If it's excess nutrients that we've found a new use for, great. But if it was returned to the soil to enrich it for future agriculture, then we'll have to replace it. If it was grown just for making fuel, then how? Growing biofuels organically is pretty expensive.

All of which isn't to say that they aren't a good idea, just that they may not be financially viable, and they also may not be environmentally preferable to the alternatives.

Joy


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.