> > <snip> what thoughts The List has about alternatives for the Vanagon. > >Considering that no manufacturer has yet to equal the versatility Sure they do... they just don't sell 'em in the US for some whacko reason (they'd sell like hotcakes). Hiaces have no engine hump in the back (heck, neither would the T3 if VW had laid-out the engine ancillaries properly). Forward-control, full-length flat floor... even available with no rear wheelarch intrusions (J-Low version), 3 wheelbases to choose from. European & US vans are crude ugly boxes which handle like c***. >of our >Vanagons and Westfalias, I would say that rebuilding the vehicle is a >viable option, Absolutely. If you can't find a suitable replacement, maintain, repair & if you like update your type 2. >True, but you will never have to replace a CV joint. A limited-slip diff >helps a lot with traction on slick surfaces, Yup... you lose traction to BOTH wheels!
-- Andrew Grebneff Dunedin New Zealand <andrew.grebneff@stonebow.otago.ac.nz> Seashell, Macintosh, VW/Toyota van nut |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.