Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (June 2004, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 3 Jun 2004 08:31:57 -0700
Reply-To:     Old Volks Home <oldvolkshome@EARTHLINK.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Old Volks Home <oldvolkshome@EARTHLINK.NET>
Subject:      Re: Non-Family Hauler
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

As a kid in the 60s, everyone in the car (50 Bug, 61 Bug, 62 Bug, then finally a 67 21 Wdw Dlx Bus,) wore seatbelts fore and aft. Even if VW didn't provide them and standard equipment then, they were optional (and there were mounting points in two of the Bugs) and my father took full advantage of it whenever possible. My father, being somewhat of a hot-rodder in the 50s (Oldsmopiles) and an aircraft buff saw the benefits of using seat belts even though we were never put to the test of their usefulness. I've never rode or driven car for most of my life without at least a lap belt. In cars that didn't have proper mounting points, my father would (particularly in the Rear Seat area) beef up the location where the belt would mount. I remember the 62 Bug I rode around in had mounting points for front shoulder belts in the B-Pillar and they were optionally available and they were installed/utilized. Myself, I never got the impression we were strange in using them, it was usually the other way around with people not using them, even after the US mandated their installation after 1967.

Whenever I have purchased a VW of any vintage, I've always replaced cruddy, torn (and usually unused) belts or retrofitted them.

Jim Thompson 84 Westfalia 2.1 "Ole Putt" oldvolkshome@earthlink.net http://www.oldvolkshome.com *************************** > [Original Message] > From: David Brodbeck <gull@GULL.US> > To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> > Date: 6/3/04 6:14:53 AM > Subject: Re: Non-Family Hauler > > On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Aristotle Sagan wrote: > > > Nope, no way. The kids like the 84 van but ya know, no shoulder belts, no > > rides. As soon as the kids were out of baby seats, the van became a extra. > >Then David wrote: > It's amazing how times change. > > When I was a kid, *none* of the vehicles I rode in ever had rear safety > belts. (They didn't appear in most American cars until well into the 90s, > and then only for the outboard seats.) When I was really young, I > remember sharing the middle seatbelt in an old Ford pickup with my sister. > That truck didn't even have a padded dashboard. In fact, I got the > impression we were a bit unusual as a family for even wearing seatbelts at > all. > > Most people are a lot more safety-conscious these days, and that's a Good > Thing. > > > David Brodbeck, N8SRE > '86 Volvo 240DL wagon > '82 VW Vanagon Westfalia Diesel


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.