On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 17:19:57 GMT, Philip Chidlaw <pchidlaw@MCN.ORG> wrote: >Has anyone verified a failed idle stabilizer control unit (251 907 393D or >similar) that *did not* show any signs of damage on the circuit board itself? >Mine is in an 87 GL. TIA. -Phil Hi Phil, My 251 907 393C was bad and had no signs of burnt components or broken solder joints. Went looking for used units. Found two that sellers said worked Ok when removed. One I tried didn't work in mine or worked as bad as my original 393C. The other worked when cold but not with the engine at normal running temperatures. Both 393C modules. Opened this second one up to look inside, nothing visibly wrong on the two boards inside. Bought a new one *393D*, ISV works as per sec now. So, there is my ISV experience to date. Was going to call it my two cents worth but, the thing was like $289. Canadian... Oh great name Phil, Phil Z. "87 Westy |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.