Hmmm... I thought I saw a (fairly recent) post on this list that said they were supposed to sit *higher* in the front, to aid stability when the weight shifts forward during hard braking. I suspect that the rear will settle some over time, since the rear has the constant weight of the engine, and several hundred pounds of tools and spare parts under the rear bench (or is that just my westie? :-) Tim At 12:17 PM 6/10/2004 -0600, Simon Reinhardt wrote: >I looked through the archives, OK? >My question is this: Why do most of the campers I've seen (and >especially the syncros) seem to sit lower in the front? >ETKA doesn't show any difference in part # between camper and passenger >vans (at least not for syncros). >It doesn't seem like the weight distribution would explain much- the >bulk of the extra weight is between the wheels. >Does it have something to do with improving the aerodynamics of the >top? Then why is there no different part #? >Besides curiosity, I ask because I have a set of passenger syncro >springs I'd like to put on my camper to improve the front approach >angle a little... > >Befuddled, >Simon |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.