Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 2004, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 16 Jul 2004 00:11:30 -0500
Reply-To:     Russell Patten <toolvanagon@HOTMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Russell Patten <toolvanagon@HOTMAIL.COM>
Subject:      German/French collaberation and Crashing Helicopters
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed

The other day I was considering the purchase of a used fuel pump from an e-bay seller, ID: 'karmanvan'. I had e-mailed him to ask the bosch part number on the pump to determine if it was the correct part for my vehical. He informed me that Bosch had different exact-match pumps with different last 4 digits of part number indicating where they were made, all exact matches for the pump that belongs in my van. Smells like a skunk to me. The Bosch part numbers I have for all of the electrics in the van (Thanks Joel) refrence only a single number for the fuel pump. Ends in 016, if memory serves. Gentleman informed me the same pump built in france ends in 011. Another for Italy.

Why would Bosch have the same pump made in different places and give it different part numbers?

>We got to where we could predict a transmission failure with an 85-90% >accuracy. Pretty good for back in those days. Made the Army and Page very >happy - and a especially a lot of pilots!!

That sounds like a pretty interesting job. I like the pilot that hovers all day as part of his advanced training. Punishment for something, I guess. I'm also curious about predicting a transmission failure in a helicopter. How do you let it happen without catastrophic consequences to man and machine?

>Tough little engine. I never saw a 1.9L with a rod through the engine case. >But I have seen plenty old air cooled engines and 2.1L WBX engines with the >rod and hole through the block. The 1.9 L engine uses a fixed length bolt >with no stretch on the rods. The 2.1L WBX uses a stretch bolt for the rod >end. Problem is the stretch bolts just keep on stretching. This allow over >time for the rod end bearings to wear to oval, lose oil pressure, and >seize, throwing a rod amd destroying the block. Good rebuilders like Bob >Donalds use the 1.9L bolts in rebuilding a 2.1L engine.

That went just a little over my head. Mind explaining with a little more elaboration? Bolts that are made to stretch?

Off to camp at Guadalupe state park this weekend. I hope to hell that the van makes it there and back. Had a couple of maintanence items I wasn't able to tackle (afford) before we leave.

-Russell

_________________________________________________________________ FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar – get it now! http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.