Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2004, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 12 Aug 2004 23:19:36 -0500
Reply-To:     rrecardo@WEBTV.NET
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Robert Cardo <rrecardo@WEBTV.NET>
Subject:      Re: Who Supports The List / The Money Has Already Been Spent
Comments: To: Vonpinky@aol.com
In-Reply-To:  Vonpinky@aol.com's message of Thu, 12 Aug 2004 23:46:46 EDT
Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII

Pinky, I am a multiple owner of many VW's and several Vanagon's over the years. I have enjoyed every one of them to the fullest. Here is what is getting depressing. Not only does any prominent VW dealer, anywhere I've been cringe when they see me rolling in their door, they have sometimes blatantly refused to perform service on my VW vehicles. I made a few calls to VWOA and they casually mentioned it the dealer's option. They seem to have no jurisdiction on who works on what. It is a pretty sad day when a dealer will not perform any kind of repairs on their own vehicle. Also I have found in my travels that one cannot locate hardly any independent shop to work on these beautiful vehicles. They do all but laugh in your face. I am semi mechanically adept, and am able to some of the service operations on my own. But there are limits to my aptitude and I find myself stifled sometimes. I will say this. Any GM vehicle was totally within my grasp as far as maintaining it, never had a shop anywhere refuse me service on any of their products, regardless of how old it was. It seems that parts availability on the older GM running gear is alway current, and available regardless what vintage it is. Now my question is, if VW was such a superior Vehicle, why the dispersions with a request for service on an overpriced ( at inception) vehicle? And I think this is the basic problem. The Vanagon was not a popular item,didn't sell well, and was difficult to maintain. Folks looking for a Van looked the other way because of price, and servicability. How many UPS. REA, as well as any other service oriented businesses actually bought the Vanagon to service their customer's? I have never seen a plumber, carpenter, roofer, chimney sweep, tile setter, or any other business of this sort running a Vanagon. Price, defensibility, and parts availability was the main cause of their sales failure here in the US. Again I'm sorry for making all aware here of the truth , and the facts. I still enjoy driving my toy VW's, even though they do sit a bunch while waiting for service to be completed, or just trying to find someone to do the extreme maintenance that I can't do, or waiting for the parts that never arrive in a timely fashion, at a resonable cost. My GM vehicles at that point are the back up, defensibility factors. Nice Talking to You.

RC


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.