>but these are full-size vans, as are Toyota >Hiaces and Kia Pregios. A small van would be say a Toyota Liteace, >which was so9ld inthe US in the 80s. A minivan would be a Subaru >Domingo, Suzuki Carry, Daihatsu Hijet or Mitubishi L100. Why is it that automobile manufacturers feel they need to come up with entirely new names for vehicles for multiple english-speaking countries? None of those models are even remotely familiar to me here in the US! On that note, why "Vanagon"? Was "Transporter" not cutesy enough for VW of America? Does everything sold in the US have to be renamed because arrogant/obnoxious US ad agencies always think they can do better? John Bange '90 Vanagon "Geldsauger" |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.