Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (October 2004, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:03:19 -0700
Reply-To:     Mark Keller <kelphoto@SHAW.CA>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Mark Keller <kelphoto@SHAW.CA>
Subject:      Re: Safe 2.1/1.9  Rpm: survey/query
Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii

I throw in my bit here too.

I brought up the issue engine durability and high rpm's vs piston ring harmonic resonance a while back. Apparently when piston rings slide up and down the cylinder walls beyond a certain speed i.e. feet per min, I believe the criteria worked out that our 3" stroke engines reach this at just over 4000 RPM, conditions begin to be conducive for ring resonance. The Green arc on our tachs stop here, with a hashed green area up to 4400 Rpm., as "temporary operation" range.

When Bob Donalds speaks of not re-using old pistons when reconditioning the engine, becasue the rings lands are always worn, this is where damage from harmonic resonance shows up. One listee wrote the list with a testimonal that he suffered engine problems, right after a 4600 something Rpm Test Run and that tear down revealed damaged ring lands. Abeit the last run was probably the "last straw which broke the camel's back."

Piston rings do resonate at some velocity. Personally the RPM onset of ring resonace is probably dependent: on milage, wear on the engine, which piston and ring combo, cyclinder wall condition and etc. . My feeling is that operation above the 4000 - 4400 range and up for continued operation is incompatible with engine longivity. How long is too long? Well condition and quality of your engine are the main variables, The more miles on the motor, the less I'd be tempted to push past the 4400 RPM limit for very long, remembering our camel example above, and not knowing the PO's driving habits!

Another listee Frank Grunthaur(sp) wrote back on this topic, that manufactures had devised a way to control piston ring resonance, with some trade offs. If you were build an engine to rev high, I guess 4000-6000 rpm, lower tension rings could be used, but cylinder sealing at lower RPM suffered-- something to that effect.

Piston Ring resonace damage is a real issue of a cumulative nature. Testimonials from owners of VWs inline engines suggest that they run at RPM above our limits for a lifetime of use without issue. Perhaps, and not a reason for me consider a swap, but if you have a inline engine, then go with the high rpm rating VW gives for inlines. For my peace of mind, comments like Bob Mcdonalds, piston ring land wear, VW's "Green Zone" on the tachometer, and the knowledge that piston ring resonance is lurking in the high rpm range, lead me to believe my engine's durability in enhanced by venturing above the limits only when needed.

Mark Keller 91 Carat


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.