Date:         Mon, 8 Nov 2004 14:14:39 -0600
Reply-To:     Paul & Becky Oliver <oliver8@TDS.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Paul & Becky Oliver <oliver8@TDS.NET>
Subject:      Re: Torque wrench use
Comments: To: Al and Sue Brase <albeeee@MCHSI.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

A wealth of knowledge here, also in A&P were to watch for movement and after
reaching proper torque, we had to go through it once more. If anything move
the slightest, we had to do it again, until it was dead on. Also we had
charts that stated how much more torque to increase for the length of the an
extension if used.

Then after finishing with the head, exhaust, etc., we had to check
calibration on the torque wrench again. If it wasn't true, you had to tear
it down and do it over again.

Paul
----- Original Message -----
From: "Al and Sue Brase" <albeeee@MCHSI.COM>
To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM>
Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2004 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: Torque wrench use


> Well, If that is happening, I'd say there is some operator error. I was
> very skeptical when I first saw the modern click  type wrenches, even
> more so of the ones from the Pacific rim.
> Let me back up here. In 1965, when I was 16, and got my first  real job,