Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (November 2004, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sun, 28 Nov 2004 11:37:21 -0600
Reply-To:     Al and Sue Brase <albeeee@MCHSI.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Al and Sue Brase <albeeee@MCHSI.COM>
Subject:      Re: Intake air flow, improvement possible?
Comments: To: syncrolist@BOSTIG.COM
In-Reply-To:  <49781.207.69.140.51.1101661123.squirrel@207.69.140.51>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed

Jim: I agree completely, and you don't have to convince me that the LMMU is a good idea. I wrote earlier: "Actually, fuel consumption MIGHT improve slightly due to more accurate mixture control. " When I wrote about compression ratio improving fuel efficiency, I should have been a little more specific and said that was the only thing that would improve fuel efficiency under all conditions. Al Brase

Bostig Engineering wrote:

>>The only simple thing that will decrease the fuel consumption would be >>to raise the compression ratio. >>Al Brase >> >> > > >Hi Al, > >Think about this scenario for second though, suppose you're running rich, >perhaps an A/F of 11.. if you change the value to say 13, will you not >both raise horsepower and lessen fuel consumption? Now in the real world, >people tend to get on whatever horsepower they have available(which tends >to mask any increase in efficiency), but in some cases (long distance, >easy driving) you are going to see the opportunity for better efficiency, >unless of course you end up driving faster since it is possible. The key >is not *only* reducing pressure drop in the intake, but ALSO measure the >air mass accurately, AND provide tunability. It is this three pronged >approach, all addressed by replacing the stock system that the gains are >realized. And as with any engine system, the gains are complimentary, for >instance I'm quite sure that the gains had by a big valve engine will be >greater than for a stock engine, because there is more potential still >choked up by the restrictive intake, and inacurate air metering. > >Thanks, > >Jim Akiba >Bostig Engineering > > >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.