Date:         Thu, 9 Dec 2004 22:05:24 -0600
Reply-To:     Stan Wilder <wilden1-1@SBCGLOBAL.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Stan Wilder <wilden1-1@SBCGLOBAL.NET>
Subject:      Re: Simple Question (push rods)second time around
Comments: To: phil cain <bearsvw2000@YAHOO.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

There are always argumets about these non kosher combinations.
Some say; Hydraulic cam with solid lifters are OK.
Some say; Solid Lifter Cam with hydraulics OK.
It's really just not a proper combination.
Remember you want thast engine to run for 100,000 miles.
If you can accept 20K or less miles it doesn't matter which way you go.
Build it right and you'll only need to build it once.

Stan Wilder
Engine Ceramics
214-352-4931
www.engineceramics.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "phil cain" <bearsvw2000@YAHOO.COM>
To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM>
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 8:15 PM
Subject: Simple Question (push rods)second time around


> What problem would there be from using solid lifters
> and push-rods on a hydraulic cam. I built the engine
> thinking I had a set of hydraulic push-rods and
> didn't, so can I just drop in the solid lifters and
> use their push-rods without any severe problems. Phil
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> The all-new My Yahoo! - What will yours do?
> http://my.yahoo.com
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.5.0 - Release Date: 12/9/2004
>
>


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.5.0 - Release Date: 12/9/2004