Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2005, week 5)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 29 Jan 2005 08:43:08 -0800
Reply-To:     Alistair Bell <albell@UVIC.CA>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Alistair Bell <albell@UVIC.CA>
Subject:      Re: [WetWesties] How do Vanagons do in the snow?
Comments: To: Robert Keezer <warmerwagen@YAHOO.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <20050129085134.26709.qmail@web51802.mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

i have to disagree with Robert here.

Having owned both a '72 and '82 (diesel) westies I can saw with no hesitation that the Vanagon is much worse in the snow or any low traction conditions.

The Vanagon has almost exactly 50/50 weight distribution unlike the pronounced rear weight bias of the loaf. Also, and this applies more to rough road/off road travel), I found the Vanagons' suspension less compliant than the loaf's. ie I could get the Vanagon to lose grip, and indeed be completely, un-weighted on one tire when going down roughish roads cum creeks here on Vancouver Island.

The loaf would keep its feet firmly planted on the ground :)

If you plan on taking your 2wd Vanagon anywhere in the snow, get snow tires. I recommend the Nokia Hakkepelitas (sp), forget the current model number for vanagon. I Just have 2 for the rear, but they are studded and make the van usable on snow and ice. If you can, get 4 tires, don't be cheap like me :)

Alistair

On 29-Jan-05, at 12:51 AM, Robert Keezer wrote:

> Michelle, > > If you just carry extra weight in the Standard > passenger Vanagon it will be fine. > The Vanagon does well on compact snow. the rear engine > weight over the rear wheels helps traction. > The low center of gravity the Vanagon has makes it > incredibly sure footed . I have been places only 4WD > would dare. > > Now that I understand what your average driving > conditions are, then yes- better than a Bay or Split? > Well, again, all three share the rear wheel drive > weight in over the driving wheels , which makes for > better traction. > > Also when stopping, the weight of the vehicle shifts > forward which pushes weight distribution front and > rear to 50/50. Even weight on both axles means more > stability in tricky braking situations. > > In your average American Van or pick-up, the weight is > in the front so even less weight is on the rear axle > when braking. These vehicles typically have less > traction . > > Robert > > 1982 Westfalia


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.