Date:         Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:08:38 -0800
Reply-To:     Robert Fisher <refisher@MCHSI.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Robert Fisher <refisher@MCHSI.COM>
Subject:      Re: SIRIUS or XM?
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
              reply-type=response

I have the opposite 'problem', if you will. We got the equipment, set up the
service, all went smoothly- they still haven't billed us. Go figger.
I find the head unit to be clunky, unwieldy and unfriendly but they all seem
to be variations on the same flavor.
My biggest problem with it is that my wife insists on listening to the 80's
pop garbage that I detested the first time it came around.

Cya,
Robert

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Renz" <aircooledchris@EUCASAFARI.VENDIOWEB.COM>
To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: SIRIUS or XM?


>I like some of the channe options a little better on Sirius, but XM seems
>to
> have a lot better range. I find deadspots a lot more often with the
> sirius.
>
> I had XM for two years and it was great, I just thought id try something
> else since they were doing their free offers back in november. Sirius has
> the most incompitent customer service department in the world though, so
> cross your fingers that everything you ordered shows up and that they dont
> somehow charge you three times for the yearly subscription, then reverse
> it
> and do the same 3 all over again.
>
> I literally spent 2 months trying to get setup and fix their messes. Im
> probably one of those 'one in a million' cases where this type of thing
> happens, but it *really* sucked.
>
> cr
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
>
>
>> What features are most important to you XM ans SIRIUS owners--which do
>> you
>> prefer and why?