Vanagon EuroVan
Previous (more recent) messageNext (less recent) messagePrevious (more recent) in topicNext (less recent) in topicPrevious (more recent) by same authorNext (less recent) by same authorPrevious page (May 2005, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 17 May 2005 12:01:27 -0600
Reply-To:     jimt <camper@TACTICAL-BUS.INFO>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         jimt <camper@TACTICAL-BUS.INFO>
Subject:      Re: Question on Biodiesel
Comments: To: Loren Busch <starwagen@GMAIL.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <86476e2505051710222100be06@mail.gmail.com>
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

On 5/17/05 11:22 AM, "Loren Busch" <starwagen@GMAIL.COM> wrote:

> Okay, here is the $64,000,000,000 question: > What is the TOTAL cost in BTU vs. BTU output realized? And what is the > TOTAL acreage dedicated to producing the vegetable matter required? > (Assuming total replacement of fossil diesel) > The last figures I saw (some years ago) on bio fuels still put them in > the same category as running a generator with an electric motor that > was powered by the generator: Net loss in the system. > (And then you get into the mess they have in the UK of the government > collecting a fuel tax on the left over fish and chips oil) > A recent PBS program was an update on a previous program they had aired about 5 yrs ago. It had some interesting info in it and showed where some really massive changes in technology have been advancing and where many others are still stuck at the starting gate.

With current costs of oil bio is becoming more cost effective. To be real cost effective oil was going to have to stay in the mid 50 buck a barrel range.

Acreage available would never feed more than 25-30% of needs.

As demand for the fuels rises so would the costs of the bio portion of the fuel. Therefore though we would increase supply we would still never meet demand. This was the critical part of the program.

The future for vehicles in the world may be multi-fuel stations. Vehicle fueling stations that provided LPG, Ethanol-Gasoline, Biodiesel, CNG, and high current charging stations (for batteries still in experimental stages).

Vehicles would become more diversified with hybrid, bi-fuel,or dual fuel capable. With the bi-fuel you would have two types of fuel in separate tanks. The computer would blend as needed by the engine. Dual fuel would be capable of running on either of two types of fuel like a propane/gasoline setup could actually be a bi or dual fuel. Hybrids are still the elect/other fuel in combination.

In the elect/hybrid area a couple French companies are working on charging stations with agreements that have set up charging spots in parking lots and at some major companies. I kind of like that idea. Park and Charge franchise coming soon to a parking lot near you.

jimt


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.