Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2005, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 4 Aug 2005 22:26:04 EDT
Reply-To:     THX0001@AOL.COM
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         George Goff <THX0001@AOL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Tongue Weight, Hauling Stuff, Bicycle Racks, et al.
Comments: To: rrecardo@WEBTV.NET
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

In a message dated 8/4/05 7:06:47 PM, rrecardo@WEBTV.NET writes:

<< Forgive George , he has sinned.

And just to make you feel a bit better dissimilar metal's can be welded together with no problem at all, and be as strong as welding the same together.

If you have the right wire, or rod. anything is possible.

High nickel content rod welds anything to anything. >>

Father Robert is right and I have done my penance by looking into the subject after sticking red hot pokers in my eyes. Still, I would not say that joining the two materials is without some possible pitfalls. To quote an expert from an engineering forum I just viewed (by the way, a pipefitter not an engineer):

"A welding procedure should first be qualified by testing to an approved code of fabrication. This would be the normal practice for any critical welding. There are other variables besides filler metal that if not controlled could lead to a poor weld.

Filler metals that have been used in other circumstances to weld low carbon steel to 300 series stainless include 309, 310, ENiCrFe and other nickel based alloys."

So, why throw another variable into the mix whenever you're fabricating a weldment which is critical yet never to be tested?

To me, it doesn't matter which materials are used and how they are joined. Carrying a bike of that mass, held to a Vanagon by means of a tow hitch receiver, shows a callous disregard, whether rooted in contempt or ignorance, for the innocent bystanders who have to share the highway with whoever is driving that abomination. Don't just look at the mass of the bike and the rating (What rating? Rated not to kink in the middle with a 400 lb. load?) of the carrier; look at the resultant forces from that thing hanging out there in the wind. The van is just not made for that task.

Moreover, years ago I once climbed off my sweet Triumph Bonneville and right onto my buddy's Honda 350 and I can tell you for a fact that the Honda was no lightweight. Now, if Honda snuck in a superlegerra 350 among the millions they stamped out, I missed it. Remember, 350 is its model designation, not its weight.

George


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.