Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2005, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 24 Aug 2005 19:12:07 -0500
Reply-To:     Stan Wilder <wilden1-1@SBCGLOBAL.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Stan Wilder <wilden1-1@SBCGLOBAL.NET>
Subject:      Re: Diamler chrysler vw...
Comments: To: Andrew Grebneff <andrew.grebneff@STONEBOW.OTAGO.AC.NZ>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

I think all US Automakers have Asian partners in many models they produce (even the new Damlier-Chrysler has Mitsubishi). Its just a matter of time until the Executives with the Golden Parachutes bail with their chutes open collecting their gold and selling the American Heritage for pennies on the dollar just like Chrysler did. One rule of economics is pretty well understood by everyone: Purchasing a new car helps the economy because it provides jobs and consumes a lot of manufactured goods. Buying used does mot help the economy because it just produces relative small purchases of parts over an extended time frame. In effect if you buy used you're not helping the economy of the foreign nation producing the car.

Stan Wilder Engine Ceramics 214-352-4931 www.engineceramics.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew Grebneff" <andrew.grebneff@STONEBOW.OTAGO.AC.NZ> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 6:01 PM Subject: Re: Diamler chrysler vw...

> >When that merger was going on I was watching a lot of the european accounts > >because the US papers were not being told much. It was interesting to > >watch. It was going to be a merger of equals with chrysler actually being > >up about 1 percent. However as the 2 year discussions and paperwork between > >government agencies in about 6 countries went on, chrysler went down in > >value again as mercedes went up in value. When it was finally signed final > >daimler was at about 60 percent of the value and chrysler was down to about > >40 percent (chrysler had to sign away all military contracts). Now it is no > >longer a merger but a coup. > > it was NEVER intended to be a merger. It was an outright buyout by > Mercedes. It was cynically called a "merger" in the US to try to > forestall "patriotic" backlash. > -- > Andrew Grebneff > Dunedin > New Zealand > Fossil preparator > <andrew.grebneff@stonebow.otago.ac.nz> > Seashell, Macintosh, VW/Toyota van nut > > HUMANITY: THE ULTIMATE VON NEUMANN MACHINE > > DEMOCRACY: RULE BY THE LOWEST COMMON DENOMINATOR


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.