Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 2005, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 9 Sep 2005 21:43:56 -0500
Reply-To:     John Rodgers <inua@CHARTER.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         John Rodgers <inua@CHARTER.NET>
Subject:      Re: alternative carburetion of FI 2.0 Liter vanagon engine???
Comments: To: jimt <camper@TACTICAL-BUS.INFO>
In-Reply-To:  <BF460620.4131%camper@tactical-bus.info>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

JimT,

That quote down below that you attribute to me abiut all devices being bought up .......... I didn't say it.

I think that quote came from Phil Cain ...... I think.

Wasn't me, in any case.

Regards,

John Rodgers 88 GL Driver

jimt wrote:

>There was a big special on one of the pbs stations on this myth a few years >back. The car companies (not oil companies) did buy up quite a few that >showed that they werent frauds or snake oil. That was very few of them in >total. Chrysler and ford both said they purchased over a dozen each for the >ownership and tested many others to verify that they were fake, or dangerous >to the vehicle. Some of the ones they bought lead to design of newer >carburators and more efficient injectors systems. Others were not >"commercially" viable. What that meant was that in order for the system to >work correctly it had to be individually tuned to each vehicle. Chevy said >they buy a couple of designs a year that they see on the web and hear of to >test out on vehicles. Most were pure fake, and others have their claims >stretched way beyond reallity. When asked what would be a guide on buying a >fuel saver device, they all said if it was real they would be selling it. > >My way was to put in a 90s subaru engine. Far superior fuel management to >the original 80s technology in my original air cooled engine. >13/17 (14) mpg (air cooled) to 18/20 (19) mpg (subie actual in my vanagon) >857 gal/12k miles to 631 gal/12k miles for almost a 220 gallon per year >difference. In my case I have already paid for most of my engine cost with >gas savings in the 3 years I have been running the newer engine. > > >Jimt > >On 9/8/05 2:09 PM, "John Rodgers" <inua@CHARTER.NET> wrote: > > > >>>>All the devices that work have been bought up by the >>>>oil companies so we won't get the mileage. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> > > > >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.