Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 2005, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 10 Sep 2005 13:08:08 -0400
Reply-To:     Dana Showers <dshowers@CPDS.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Dana Showers <dshowers@CPDS.NET>
Subject:      Advice on possible engine replacement
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

I did get two pumps with the package I bought. I kept the one on that came with it because it would cost less during the conversion. Besides, if I get the economy (first) and power (second) that I want, I don't care about an extra 'n' horse power. The lower emissions are a bonus for me. My van is a road Westy, not an off road syncro. I did opt for a limited slip differential with my tranny rebuild, as I have gotten stuck on flat driveways when one wheel was off the ground!

To answer the question posed by the Bus Depot guy (Ron?) about why I say to replace the engine the first time an engine repair costs more than $100-$200 and you have to pay someone else to do it: My experience has been that the engine, whether through age or mileage, is on its way to nickle and diming you to death. Also, it would probably be a good time to look at the radiator, the hoses and other parts at that time. Of course with my engine conversion, I got all new hoses, lines and other "weatherable" parts. By the time I got around to the engine conversion I had spent a great deal of TIME and money trying to make the van reliable for road trips and everyday driving. I wish now that I would have known this wisdom back in 1997. Don't get me wrong, the guy who bought my 1.9 boxer told me that it is running very well for him after it was in my van for 243k miles. Those are good engines, but the TD and other options are soooo much better, especially for someone who does not do their own maintenance.

Dana 85 Westy 1.9TD 2004 Beetle TDI

I'm curious as to why you opted for an Eco-Diesel injection pump.

I'm under the impression the Eco-Diesel injection pumps do not have a provision for fuel enrichment under boost, so your "turbo-diesel" is essentially an NA diesel with a fancy airpump tacked onto the intake and exhaust manifolds. Good for reducing emissions, but does nothing to enhance powah...needs more fuel to do that. Or, maybe that's what you wanted. I owned an NA diesel Vanagon a while back, so that wouldn't be my first choice.

On 9/8/05, Dana Showers <dshowers@cpds.net> wrote: I did consider it, but opted for the 29MPG turbo diesel > with the VW factory eco-diesel fuel pump. I have yet to see what my > MPG is with my new taller 3rd and 4th gears! Thanks to Daryl at AA > Transmission for a great tranny rebuild and great customer service at > a reasonable price.

Casey Olympia, WA Biodiesel: '87 300TD intercooler (209k) '84 300D (204k) Gashuffer: '89 Vanagon Wolfsburg Edition (185K)


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.