Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 2005, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 9 Sep 2005 20:52:24 -0500
Reply-To:     Jim Felder <felder@KNOLOGY.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Jim Felder <felder@KNOLOGY.NET>
Subject:      Re: gas mileage
Comments: To: Maggie Dew <maggie@WESTFAM.NET>
In-Reply-To:  <WorldClient-F200509092019.AA19150045@westfam.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

I'm the one who made the suggestion about braking with the brakes and not the engine. It wasn't a very popular suggestion, in fairness, and I doubt that it plays a big part in saving gas compared with the other things, but it's part of my regimen which overall is working just fine. As you say I am up to 21 and 21.5, previously the same as you were. Using the same techniques in my diesel westy I am getting 28.1.

What it has to do with (the disengaging) is not letting the engine think it is being asked to use any fuel at all. I push in the clutch and let the engine go to idle as I approach a stop sign up a ramp, for instance, where the rise in the ramp also helps to brake. Unlike some of the assumptions made about my comments on this technique, I am no so stupid as to apply it in every situation, but only where it makes sense.

You do put less strain on the moving parts of the engine by doing this, even if it doesn't actually save fuel--and I don't know that it doesn't.

By slowing down and driving smoother, the brakes are less important anyway. And they're eminently replaceable, unlike the valve train parts some people are so adamant about using to slow down. We drive these big clunky wind-brakes (did I just brake wind?) so use the huge frontal area to slow down with. It works pretty well.

The best idea I heard out of the mileage discussion was the suggestion to use the AC on the highway, where the aerodynamic advantages of rolled-up windows offset the drag of the compressor, but turn it off in town where the drag of the compressor offsets the drag of the low-speed aerodynamics.

Drive smoothly,

Jim

On Sep 9, 2005, at 8:19 PM, Maggie Dew wrote:

> I took the recent suggestions on the list regarding improving one's gas > mileage. I aired all the tires to the proper psi, slowed down to 60 > (occasionally 65), and have quit downshifting to come to a stop. I > have > always used the gears to slow down and I'm not sure how it helps to > just > use the clutch and brake. Does it have to do with disengaging the > gears > and not putting torque on the engine? I know my ignorance is probably > showing again, but oh well. At any rate, I am up to 21 or 22 mpg > (previously 18 to 20). > > Maggie > '85 Subaru-Westy "Anne Bonney" >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.