Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 19:26:27 -0500
Reply-To: Jim Felder <felder@KNOLOGY.NET>
Sender: Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From: Jim Felder <felder@KNOLOGY.NET>
Subject: Re: OT Hurricanes--really an accident?
In-Reply-To: <002a01c5bfd2$c1fcba50$6601a8c0@oemcomputer>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Wrong. Rush Limbaugh says that environmentalists say that, but they
don't say that.
Jim
On Sep 22, 2005, at 7:07 PM, turbodieseltrooper wrote:
> That's the whole point - environmentalists says it's global warming
> just
> based on the last decade
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "greg crone" <l_levi1@yahoo.com>
> To: "turbodieseltrooper" <turbodieseltrooper@SBCGLOBAL.NET>
> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 10:55 AM
> Subject: Re: OT Hurricanes--really an accident?
>
>
>> Your're using two sets of numbers containing only 50
>> units each. The standard deviation makes the results
>> useless.........Get 10,000 years on both sides of the
>> tech and non-tech eras and then you have something to
>> compare.
>> What you're doing is akin to flipping a coin 5 times
>> at night and 5 times in daylight, and saying the
>> sunlight caused the difference.
>>
>> --- turbodieseltrooper
>> <turbodieseltrooper@SBCGLOBAL.NET> wrote:
>>
>>> >> Global warming is not scientifically PROVEN, and
>>> even if it is happening,
>>> >> so what? We have NO idea why it's happening.
>>>
>>> >Not altogether true. Just like in plague times,
>>> there were people who knew.
>>> >they just didn't have the political voice to
>>> convince anyone who mattered.
>>>
>>> The ones who claim to know are rarley chalenged.
>>> They never admit that they
>>> are wrong and when proven wrong, they can only
>>> resort to name calling.
>>>
>>> http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pastdec.shtml
>>>
>>> This shows the number of hurrican strikes to the US,
>>> by decade, since 1851.
>>> I didn't plot it on a graph, but it does show signs
>>> of a cycle. The sources
>>> of greenhouse gases (ie cars) WERE NON existant or
>>> small in number (as
>>> compared to today) from 1851 to 1910. Now compare
>>> this to the years 1951 to
>>> 2004 which has lower numbers?? Facts don't lie. t
>>> appears that we are on an
>>> upward cycle.
>>>
>>> > don't think we need to think too much beyond
>>> simply lowering
>>> greenhouse gas output at this point, to cool down
>>> what we THINK we've essed
>>> up while we search for answers in a scientific
>>> environment unfettered by
>>> politics.
>>>
>>> It is the poltics of Socialism that drives the
>>> global warming crowd. You
>>> only need to look at the Kioto(sp?) accord. By it
>>> own reasearch, it will do
>>> very little, yet it handicaps the US.
>>>
>>> gunslinger13x
>>> allways outnumbered, never outgunned
>>>
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
|