Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:07:15 -0700
Reply-To: turbodieseltrooper <turbodieseltrooper@SBCGLOBAL.NET>
Sender: Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From: turbodieseltrooper <turbodieseltrooper@SBCGLOBAL.NET>
Subject: Re: OT Hurricanes--really an accident?
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
That's the whole point - environmentalists says it's global warming just
based on the last decade
----- Original Message -----
From: "greg crone" <l_levi1@yahoo.com>
To: "turbodieseltrooper" <turbodieseltrooper@SBCGLOBAL.NET>
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: OT Hurricanes--really an accident?
> Your're using two sets of numbers containing only 50
> units each. The standard deviation makes the results
> useless.........Get 10,000 years on both sides of the
> tech and non-tech eras and then you have something to
> compare.
> What you're doing is akin to flipping a coin 5 times
> at night and 5 times in daylight, and saying the
> sunlight caused the difference.
>
> --- turbodieseltrooper
> <turbodieseltrooper@SBCGLOBAL.NET> wrote:
>
>> >> Global warming is not scientifically PROVEN, and
>> even if it is happening,
>> >> so what? We have NO idea why it's happening.
>>
>> >Not altogether true. Just like in plague times,
>> there were people who knew.
>> >they just didn't have the political voice to
>> convince anyone who mattered.
>>
>> The ones who claim to know are rarley chalenged.
>> They never admit that they
>> are wrong and when proven wrong, they can only
>> resort to name calling.
>>
>> http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pastdec.shtml
>>
>> This shows the number of hurrican strikes to the US,
>> by decade, since 1851.
>> I didn't plot it on a graph, but it does show signs
>> of a cycle. The sources
>> of greenhouse gases (ie cars) WERE NON existant or
>> small in number (as
>> compared to today) from 1851 to 1910. Now compare
>> this to the years 1951 to
>> 2004 which has lower numbers?? Facts don't lie. t
>> appears that we are on an
>> upward cycle.
>>
>> > don't think we need to think too much beyond
>> simply lowering
>> greenhouse gas output at this point, to cool down
>> what we THINK we've essed
>> up while we search for answers in a scientific
>> environment unfettered by
>> politics.
>>
>> It is the poltics of Socialism that drives the
>> global warming crowd. You
>> only need to look at the Kioto(sp?) accord. By it
>> own reasearch, it will do
>> very little, yet it handicaps the US.
>>
>> gunslinger13x
>> allways outnumbered, never outgunned
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
|