Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (October 2005, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 15 Oct 2005 19:03:04 -0700
Reply-To:     Robert Fisher <refisher@MCHSI.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Robert Fisher <refisher@MCHSI.COM>
Subject:      Re:      Re: Volkscafe.com is now Van-Café.com
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
              reply-type=original

As I understand it, the owners of the trademarks 'xerox' and 'band-aid' (among others) lost certain rights associated with the trademarks in part because they didn't aggressively defend those rights against casual use in publications, etc. That is to say, it became common to say you would 'xerox' something as opposed to copying it, and you would put a 'band-aid' on a cut instead of using an adhesive bandage. They didn't move aggressively to stop that 'erosion' of uniqueness so they lost the right to claim it anymore. I'm sure that's an oversimplification, but I believe that's the gist of it. Given things like that, I can see why Volkswagen would take an aggressive stance regarding their entire name, particularly in light of some of the rulings involving internet domain names. As far as the thing with 'volks' goes, I wonder if it's the use of the word in association with their product. Having said that, I'm not sure why people are allowed to trademark common phrases or words, but apparently it is allowed. Trump got into a legal tangle over his attempt to trademark 'You're fired', and several different entities got into a mess over the trademark to 'Let's roll' following 9/11. I just don't get that and it pisses me off. Who the hell are they to commandeer common words and phrases we've all been using our entire lives? I can see it if it's something unique that they created but 'you're fired'? What the hell?

Cya, Robert

----- Original Message ----- From: <JordanVw@AOL.COM> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 6:16 PM Subject: Re: Volkscafe.com is now Van-Café.com

> In a message dated 10/15/05 7:48:55 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > mailinglist@FASTFORWARD.CA writes: > > >> http://arbiter.wipo.int/domains/decisions/html/2004/d2004-0498.html > > what a bunch of fancy lawyer mumbo jumbo poo poo.. its amazing that > vee-dub (cant spell it out otherwise their lawyers will get me) has > people who's > sole job it is to seek out everyone who "infringes on their copyright".. > > this is why i will NEVER buy a new volk...err vee-dub.. > > chris


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.