I would have never thought of that. But I did find that O2 sensors bond to money much more readily than CO2 sensors, so I was going to go the CO2 route anyway. Thanks Jim On Dec 16, 2005, at 11:59 AM, Bostig Eng. wrote: > Jim, > > Keep in mind that CO bonds to red blood cells more readily than > oxygen, so if there is sufficient CO, it won't matter if there is > plenty of oxygen, you will still suffocate. > > Hope this helps, > > Jim Akiba > > > At 10:21 PM 12/15/2005, Jim Felder wrote: >> Is there a decent low oxygen sensor on the market? Does it not make >> more sense to test for the lack of something you need (oxygen) than >> the >> presence of something you don't? >> >> I was wondering if anyone had experience with such. > > ________________________________________ > Bostig Engineering > Engine Systems Voodoo > http://www.bostig.com/ > 978.772.3274 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.