Date:         Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:27:55 +0000
Reply-To:     joe trussell <vanagongl@HOTMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         joe trussell <vanagongl@HOTMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Weekenders - how many different configurations?
Comments: To: inua@CHARTER.NET
In-Reply-To:  <43C75371.3050106@charter.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed

I prefer the weekender layout in most ways.  I use a Coleman stove for
cooking at the campsite and a cooler full of ice for refrigeration duties,
so the fridge/stove combo on a full Westy would be superfluous for my needs.

One thing I like about full Westies is the extra storage space next to the
rear bench seat.  Also, I like the front table and the swivel seats.
Otherwise, I like mine.  More open space, a nice big fold-out table, and a
rear cabinet, but with a full-size rear bed.

Joe T.
'85 Wolfsburg Westfalia
Denver, CO


>From: John Rodgers <inua@CHARTER.NET>
>Reply-To: John Rodgers <inua@CHARTER.NET>
>To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
>Subject: Weekenders - how many different configurations?
>Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 01:14:57 -0600
>
>I'm curious about this. I have often thought of getting some form of
>camper type van but have never been really fond of the full blown Westy
>campers. What appeals to me for my purposes would be a van with a
>pop-top, no storage closet, full width folding down rear seat for a
>bed.and  maybe even no stove, sink, fridge, etc. Just a bare bones
>pop-top vehicle. Is there such a configuration? Is this configuration a
>Weekender??
>
>What say all.
>
>Regards,
>
>John Rodgers
>88 G Driver

_________________________________________________________________
Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/