Good read, a bit "legal" and difficult to translate into English but quite interesting. Making a case that the VW was negligent by putting the engine in the back, to me is like saying Harley is negligent for not protecting you on a motorcycle or the Mini is negligent for being small. Goes to show lawyers well make a case against anybody at anytime, about anything so long as it makes CASH. Their claim that VW changed the design to front engine Eurovan because they "knew" the rear engine was unsafe displays this in spades. What about the 911, or Boxster, or any other mid engine sports car like the Ferr, or Lamb, Maz all with mid engine, hey thats unsafe and they should be sued for it. What about "pusher" motorhomes? Greyhound busses. Gawd. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Geza Polony" <gezapolony@SBCGLOBAL.NET> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 7:18 PM Subject: No, but here's a good reason to do it
> Grim, but real. > > http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/getopn.pl?OPINION=98-1812.01A > > I'm thinking of installing them myself. > > Let us know how it goes... |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.