Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2006, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 28 Jan 2006 10:02:11 -0800
Reply-To:     mark drillock <drillock@EARTHLINK.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         mark drillock <drillock@EARTHLINK.NET>
Subject:      Re: Anyone install 3 point rear seat belts in camper??
In-Reply-To:  <vanagon%2006012812302132@GERRY.VANAGON.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed

Any breakage of the rear bench seat belt was most likely due to damage that occurred to it before the accident. I have seen plenty of them that have been repeatedly caught up in the bench mechanism with numerous cuts to prove it. Others I have seen were clearly exposed to abrasions and chemicals from items stored under the bench.

You may be able to argue that the ease with which the seat belts get damaged is itself a defect but it is not a weakness of the belt itself IMHO. At some point the owner bears some responsibility to replace damaged belts and avoid future damage.

I have also seen plenty of front seat shoulder belts with damage from gnawing, presumably by pets left in the vehicle while the owner shopped or something.

Mark

Geza Polony wrote:

>No, but it's worth doing... > >I mis-titled this when I put it on yesterday. It's a lawsuit brought against >VW of America by accident victims in Maine about 10 years ago, in which a >Vanagon spun out on black ice, killed and maimed their kids because, as they >claimed, the seat belts BROKE during the accident! The evidence was >disallowed in court because the Vanagon had already gone to the wreckers, >and because of this VW won both the original case and an appeal. Here's the >case: > >http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/getopn.pl?OPINION=98-1812.01A > >Personally, I believe the testimony of the plaintiffs, even though I can see >why the evidence was thrown out. > >Conclusion: OEM seatbelts are inadequate, especially in the rear, because >they don't include shoulder belts and because THEY BREAK on serious impact. > >Sobering thought. Now back to something more fun. > > >Geza > > > >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.