Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2006, week 5)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 30 Jan 2006 21:24:02 +0000
Reply-To:     Florian Speier <groups.florian@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Florian Speier <groups.florian@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Metric this, metric that
Comments: To: Jake de Villiers <crescentbeachguitar@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:  <71d9cdf90601301305q54658eaep6027ce0c00896ef2@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

jake,

as an architect i hope you are joking. simplle question: if your architect/builder/whatever hands you an 1:1 model, how many times smaller is it than what you finally get?

answer: 12 times. 1:1 means 1 foot=1inch....... so, how many times smaller is a 1:3/4 model/plan?

car example. wrench sizes 1/8, 3/16, 1/4, 5/16, 3/8........ isnt it easier to say 12, 13, 14, 15?

coming to your playwood example: true, if you keep the same size. but just cut them 2.5m x 5m

welcome to the new tire thread. hope this doesnt dissolve into US vs the rest of the world......

florian

On 1/30/06, Jake de Villiers <crescentbeachguitar@gmail.com> wrote: > > Worse than that Kim, they use kilopascals, and I'll send you one if you > really want one! I still don't know whether the barometric pressure is > fair > or foul! > If you think the metric system is cool, try living with the stuff. It is > completely non-intuitive and indeed was designed by the French to be that > way! A 4 x 8 sheet of plywood is theoretically 2440 x 4880 mm. No way. If > you ask someone to show you with their hands what 2 feet looks like, most > people get pretty close - ask them to show you 60 centimeters and they're > stumped. With feet and inches I can divide a foot by 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and > 12. > With metric, you can only use 1, 2, 5 and 10, making it much more > difficult > to use in construction. The CBC, because it is funded by the Canadian > Government, had to convert all its scenery to metric! Cost a lot for zero > gain. > > I'm surprised that I am still so pissed off that we went Metric, but > really, there is no good reason to use it in your daily life. I already > have > tons of wrenches in Imperial and Metric, and that's where it should have > stopped. > > Sorry for the tirade. I feel calmer now. > > Feet and inches, chains and rods, gallons and miles forever! > > On 1/30/06, Kim Brennan <kimbrennan@mac.com> wrote: > > > > Okay, for all you folk that are so high on converting to the metric > > system....what's the pressure in your tires? Uh, huh. What's that PSI > > thing again? > > > > So, let's see would that be 2.75 bar in my tires...or 3.3 when fully > > loaded. Bah, let's use hectopascals instead. 2750 or 3300 (roughly). > > > > Hmm, I wonder where I can get a tire gauge that measures in > > hectopascals. > > > > > > -- > Jake > 1984 Vanagon GL > 1986 Westy Weekender "Dixie" > www.crescentbeachguitar.com >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.