Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (February 2006, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:53:39 -0600
Reply-To:     Al and Sue Brase <albeeee@MCHSI.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Al and Sue Brase <albeeee@MCHSI.COM>
Subject:      Re: running problems, 2.1
Comments: To: dhaynes@OPTONLINE.NET
Comments: cc: vickrail@velocity.net
In-Reply-To:  <43CDD755.7010608@mchsi.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

List: About 2 weeks ago I sent out this request for help. I got a few good replies. two in particular were most relevant to my 2 problems. Michael Vickey sent me an article about repairing the ground wire terminals on the FI harness. I repaired several on the 87 which seemed to be corroded. I ran out of terminals and will do the rest later. And the winner is: Dennis Haynes! He wrote:

>Most engine running problems come down to the O2 circuit or the temp 2 >circuit. An easy check is to quickly turn the ignition off and back on >while the engine is still running. If the problem goes away for 30 to 60 >seconds, the problem is the O2 circuit. If not, check the temp 2 >circuit. Hard starting , especially after the engine is warm is usually >and bad connection on the temp 2 sensor. It is extremely rare for this >sensor to go bad, but the connection has a lot to be desired. The >problem is worsened because the idle stabilizer uses this same sensor. >Of the 2 wires on this sensor, one goes to the ecu, the other is a >ground. Add another ground here. > BOTH of my cars were suffering from this problem. It seems like an incredible coincidence that both cars would fail at the same time after having had such a long run without trouble At least 2 years on the 91 and perhaps 4 years on the 87. I'm still open to suggestions of how I can do a good job of cleaning these connections. I wiggled them repeatedly and now they run better, but I know I need to get them cleaner than this. Thanks, guys! Al Brase

Al and Sue Brase wrote:

> I recently changed engines in my brown 87. That is the engine I > overhauled 8 years, 60k miles ago. It was running great, but leaking > somewhat at the head gaskets. (plus it has extreme wear on the cam > bearing thrust). > I put in one from my old Silver 87 that I wrecked in 2002. This > engine had been stored in the lower level of my garage where it is kinda > damp. When I got the thing running, I had problems with the dynamic oil > pressure system. The problem proved to be BOTH sensor wires were > corroded off on the harness on the motor. LIkely as a result of the > dampness in storage. > Anyway, After I got it driving, it would start out nice, but as it > warmed up start running really lowsy. I eventually realized it was > smoking sooty black smoke. I disconnected the O2 sensor wire and it > cleaned right up. Now today, it is running rich again, smokey, loading > up. > Any ideas? FWIW, I used most all the original FI parts from the original > engine, not the one that was damp. The only parts I used from that motor > were: The oil pressure sensors and wire harness, the O2 sensor, the 2 > temp sensors on the thermostat housing. The fuel injectors, FI > (Digifant) harness, idle stabilizer, hoses,fuel pressure regulator, AFM, > and ECU were from the old engine. (Which worked great and had been > working great for a LONG time.) > Now here's the kicker: This afternoon, my wife was driving the 91 > and it stalled and wouldn't restart. When I got there, it started and > ran till I got into my own driveway. It WAS smoking sooty smoke. But > this one wouldn't restart. Even after I took the O2 sensor wire off. I > suspect something temperature related. Possibly even the Hall sensor. > So, both 2.1's fail the same day. What gives? Weather? It was cold > (high 20'sF) and dry. Both these have been super reliable. Last year, > the 91 was in 22 states and 2 provinces. In about 20 days. 20 long days. > Maybe thermonuclear pulse? I can accept the possibility that both > cars are not suffering from the same problem. > Al Brase > >> >> >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.