Date:         Mon, 6 Feb 2006 09:28:32 -0600
Reply-To:     John Rodgers <inua@CHARTER.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         John Rodgers <inua@CHARTER.NET>
Subject:      Re: AUTO TRANS
Comments: To: BenT Syncro <syncro@GMAIL.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <ccafde090602050513l1394b01ancd21b957719a3f35@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

BenT Syncro wrote:

>On 2/5/06, John Rodgers <inua@charter.net> wrote:
>
>
>>BenT,
>>
>>"Good & used" could well mean oats already passed through the horse.....!
>>The good had already been used up out of them.
>>
>>Would not the term "Used Servicable"  better apply?
>>It is an old Aviation term but I think it would be more applicable. With
>>airplanes you never install used parts willy-nilly. Eich part had to
>>have a certification of some sort as to it's integrity. Used parts would
>>be inspected, and if found within specs, it wouldbe "yellow-tagged" and
>>the tag woul dsay "Used Servicable Part"
>>
>>Couldn't sleep this morning so I  thought I would get up and stir the
>>pot!!
>>
>>
>
>
>I don't know, John. Is that term anything like the term "Used ServicEable"
>part? I can't be sure because English is a second language to me.
>
>BenT Ng Galeesh
>
>
>
>
Naaah! You got it wrong, BenT.

It is not "Used Servicable",

It' not   "Used ServicEable".
but
It's more like "Used Serviceable"!! :-D

Sorry for your difficulty with language Number 2<grin>. It's is a
difficult language to master.

Best Regards,

John Rodgers
88 GL Driver