Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 2006, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 4 Mar 2006 00:46:00 -0500
Reply-To:     Dennis <guskersthecat@YAHOO.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Dennis <guskersthecat@YAHOO.COM>
Subject:      Re: Power loss with 15" wheels?

http://gerry.vanagon.com/cgi-bin/wa.exe?A2=ind0409D&L=vanagon&P=R6602

I did some math on this a while ago. The reason folks often have varying results is pretty much because there are a lot of variables. Rolling diameter is somewhat of a red herring in this discussion, because that's really not the issue. Rotational mass is everything. It is entirely possible to have two wheel sets, same rolling diameter, with significantly different rotation mass. How far the mass is from the hub is also critical.

A great example is my winter tire/rim combination vs my summer setup on my daily driver. Both have identical rolling diameters, but the winters are on 13" rims and the summers 15" There is an immediate difference on switching over to winters in that the car goes to redline much quicker, and is noticeably faster. The 13" alloy/winter tire combination is also significanly lighter. It's a bit hard to measure on the G-tech (0-60 times) as the starting traction is far less with the skinny winters....but it feels like swapping a lightened flywheel in there. Like a lightened flywheel, there is no difference in horsepower, but the vehicle is quicker due to less work being required to spin up the various rotating systems. Remember in these tests, that the wheel systems are within .25" in rolling diameter! Another great example is switching over to a lightweight rim/tire system on a mountain bike. .5kg per wheel (you can do this with tires alone) is absolutely noticeable in your legs when accelerating, or ascending. Sports Car Driver did a dyno test on an Acura RSX before after a larger disc brake swap. The swap cost the equivalent of 11HP in acceleration times.

Once you've accelerated to a steady state, rotation mass is less of an issue. As far as you out coasting your buddy, that's all about rolling resistance...your skinny tires have less. Think 10 speed vs mountain bike tires.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.